• Home
  • Sociology
  • Attribution by Gifford Weary, Melinda A. Stanley, John H. Harvey (auth.)

Attribution by Gifford Weary, Melinda A. Stanley, John H. Harvey (auth.)

By Gifford Weary, Melinda A. Stanley, John H. Harvey (auth.)

This booklet at first used to be conceived in 1986 by way of Weary and Harvey as a revi­ sion and replace in their 1981 views on Attributional methods (pub­ lished via Wm. C. Brown," Dubuque, Iowa). in spite of the fact that: toe huge nature of modern paintings on attributional tactics and the chance to collabo­ fee with Melinda Stanley as a coauthor resulted in a plan to boost a extra entire paintings than the 1981 ebook. It certainly is an amalgam of our pursuits in social and scientific psychology. It represents our dedication to easy theoretical and empirical inquiry mixed with the functions of principles and strategies to figuring out attribution in additional naturalistic set­ tings, and because it unfolds within the lives of other varieties of humans dealing with different difficulties of residing. The booklet represents a dedication additionally to the breadth of method of attribution questions epitomized via Fritz Heider's uniquely artistic brain and paintings in pioneering the world. To us, the attribu­ tional process isn't a sacrosanct university of notion at the human condi­ tion. it really is, really, a physique of principles and findings that we discover to be hugely important in our paintings as social (JH and GW) and medical (GW and MS) psychology students. it really is an inviting strategy that, as we will describe within the publication, brings jointly principles and paintings from diverse fields in psychology-all thinking about the pervasive and inestimab1e significance of interpretive task in human event and behavior.

Show description

Read Online or Download Attribution PDF

Best sociology books

An Outline of Sociology As Applied to Medicine

Because the final variation of this booklet, released in 1983, the textual content has been rewritten and rearranged to provide an up to date evaluation of the topic. The emphasis is on offering a framework for knowing the connection among health and wellbeing care and the society during which it happens

Routledge Handbook of European Sociology

The Routledge instruction manual of eu Sociology explores the most facets of the paintings and scholarship of ecu sociologists throughout the last sixty years (1950-2010), a interval that has formed the tools and id of the sociological craft. ecu social concept has produced an enormous constellation of theoretical landscapes with a much achieving impression.

Extra info for Attribution

Sample text

To the extent that internal cues are weak, ambiguous, or uninterpretable .... " How do we know whether internal cues should be so characterized? Bern's statements are silent about such reservations as these. Bern's presumably nonmotivational perspective also does not address the question of why people make attributions. Indeed, to answer such a question would require invoking some motivational principle, such as a desire to understand or control one's social environment. These points notwithstanding, Bern's influence has been important.

Kruglanski and his colleagues drew distinctions among the content, logic, and course of epistemic behavior and provided this general description of their focus: "The content of naive epistemology is the laymen's total set of concepts pertaining to the world of experience. The epistemic logic is the assessment criterion, the fulfillment of which yields a sense of valid knowledge. The course of lay inquiry is the sequence of cognitive operations intended to assess the possibility of significant new knowledge" (1978, p.

She is kind) requires distinctiveness (or covariation) between the specific person and an effect ("low consensus," in Kelley's terminology) and consistency across other 'Plausible causes, for example, entity and circumstance ("time" and "modality") . The evidence Kruglanski et a1. (1978) advanced to support their position is indirect and does not show that people necessarily feel that certain pieces of knowledge are consistent and others inconsistent. , consensus, "Others did not laugh at the comedian").

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.81 of 5 – based on 8 votes